Browse by regulation1 article · 1 high
21 CFR 820.100
Every DSRV article whose Regulatory Snapshot cites 21 CFR 820.100: the enforcement case behind it, the inspection exposure it created, and what the desk would do about it.
Inspection exposure across the set
- What has FDA cited under 21 CFR 820.100?
- 1 DSRV article cite 21 CFR 820.100. Enforcement cases behind them: FDA Warning Letters to Medline Industries, LP, CMS Case 723866, March 25, 2026, and Intas Pharmaceuticals Limited, CMS Case 721151, March 30, 2026. Inspection exposure across them: 1 high.
- What does DSRV recommend for 21 CFR 820.100?
- From the newest article (The CAPAs Were Filed. The Problem Kept Recurring.): FDA has moved past asking whether a CAPA procedure exists to asking whether closed CAPAs changed outcomes, so any failure type that recurs within a year of closure is standing evidence that the root cause was never correctly identified. DSRV is decision support, not legal advice; verify against the official source each article names.
In brief
Address this risk
Pressure-test your evidence before an inspector reads it
Bring the document that has to hold up under 21 CFR 820.100. DSRV maps the evidence, names the gaps, and routes judgment calls to human review. Controlled intake, no public file upload.
Regulatory intelligence and interpretation, not legal advice. Verify against the official FDA or ICH source each article names.