Browse by regulation1 article · 1 high
21 CFR 211.180(a)
Every DSRV article whose Regulatory Snapshot cites 21 CFR 211.180(a): the enforcement case behind it, the inspection exposure it created, and what the desk would do about it.
Inspection exposure across the set
- What has FDA cited under 21 CFR 211.180(a)?
- 1 DSRV article cite 21 CFR 211.180(a). Enforcement cases behind them: FDA data integrity warning letters to Sun Pharmaceutical, Ipca Laboratories, and Hetero Drugs, read against FDA's guidance for industry, Data Integrity and Compliance With Drug CGMP: Questions and Answers, December 2018. Inspection exposure across them: 1 high.
- What does DSRV recommend for 21 CFR 211.180(a)?
- From the newest article (FDA Data Integrity Enforcement Is Accelerating — Here's What the Warning Letters Actually Say): The separating control is whether audit trail review, OOS-rate trending, and validated technical access controls run as scheduled operations, because FDA reads an undetected manipulation pattern as a failed quality system rather than an analyst problem. DSRV is decision support, not legal advice; verify against the official source each article names.
In brief
Address this risk
Pressure-test your evidence before an inspector reads it
Bring the document that has to hold up under 21 CFR 211.180(a). DSRV maps the evidence, names the gaps, and routes judgment calls to human review. Controlled intake, no public file upload.
Regulatory intelligence and interpretation, not legal advice. Verify against the official FDA or ICH source each article names.